write a discussion post response to: Class, If I were a judge attempting to decide which group was right in this scenario, the evidence I would need for both sides would include actual stats and numbers to back up what they are saying. For the conservationists, I would need the stats on how watershed protection and other ecological functions of forests are more economically valuable than timber. For the timber companies, I would need stats on how continued production supports stable jobs and local economies. I would have them gather this evidence for me through reputable resources. If I gathered the evidence as a judge, that could potentially make me biased to a certain side, so it would be their responsibility to gather this information in order for a fair judgment