write a discussion using the following information:

Case illustrations include relevant facts, holding, and rationale; when available, provide a positive and negative illustration in each CREAC

Summary Silvia's case requires careful consideration of Ohio's employer intentional tort law, specifically Ohio Revised Code $2745\mathrm{.}01.$ This statute governs when an employer can be held liable for deliberately causing harm to an employee. In addition to analyzing the statute, key case law, including Fyffe v$.$ Jeno's, Inc. and Blankenship v$.$ Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc., helps clarify the standard of "deliberate intent" that must be met for Silvia's claim to succeed. Secondary sources such as law review articles and reports on immigrant working conditions in the meatpacking industry further contextualize the risks faced by employees like Silvia, especially when proper training and equipment are lacking due to language barriers or employer negligence. Explanation: Introduction Silvia Gomez, an $18-$year$-$old immigrant from Cuba, was injured while working at Waynesville's Best Meat Processing Plant in Ohio. Her injuries, including a degloving injury and post$-$traumatic stress disorder $($PTSD$),$ raise significant legal questions about the liability of her employer for the unsafe working conditions and the possible failure to properly safeguard employees from known hazards. The case also highlights the unique challenges faced by immigrant workers, such as language barriers and improper training. This analysis will explore the legal framework governing employer liability for intentional torts in Ohio, using relevant statutes, case law, and secondary sources to determine whether Silvia's employer can be held liable. Additionally, it will examine the working conditions for immigrant employees in the meatpacking industry, which contribute to the context of Silvia's situation.

Question$$Presented$$

When can an employer be held liable for deliberately causing harm to an employee?$$

$$

$`$Brief Answer$$

The employer can be held liable if he acted with deliberate intent to cause harm.$$

$$

$$

Discussion$$

Thesis Paragraph$$

Silvia Gomez, an $18-$year$-$old immigrant from Cuba, was injured at Waynesville's Best Meat Processing Plant in Ohio. Her injuries, including a degloving injury and post$-$traumatic stress disorder $($PTSD$),$ raise legal questions about her employer's liability for unsafe working conditions and the potential failure to properly safeguard employees from known hazards. The case also highlights the unique challenges faced by immigrant workers, such as language barriers and improper training. This analysis will explore the legal framework governing employer liability for intentional torts in Ohio, using relevant statutes, case law, and secondary sources to determine whether Silvia's employer can be held liable. Additionally, it will examine the working conditions for immigrant employees in the meatpacking industry, which contributes to the context of Silvia's situation.