write a literature review on this article Corra coe pr its manifestation: an inherently The expression "but I know it when I see it$"$ was first used by Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court Hon. Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v$.$ Ohio to explain his finding that the movie The Lovers $($Les Amants$)$ did not, in his view, contain obscenity; he implied that obscenity could perhaps not be well defined, but one would recognize it when one saw it$.$ Sometimes the same is true of corruption: you know it when you see it $-$ or when you hear about it; it ranges from brash notions of "eating the national cake" to a benign suggestion to "buy lunch", "tea" or "chicken", to "facilitate business" $\text{'}$ sometimes codified as "missing files" that magically reappear when money changes hands, and bundles of cash passed discreetly, or briefcases brought to offices by burly bodyguards. In other places and times, it manifests as exceedingly complex, shadowy, pay$-$to$-$play, influence peddling, and underhand, covert meetings in back rooms where only the elites have admittance; it is about contracts and passports and oil deals and weapons acquisitions and cover$-$ups. Rose$-$Ackerman and Palifka, while arguing that their list is inclusive rather than exhaustive, highlight eight types of corruption: bribery, extortion, exchange of favors, nepotism, cronyism, judicial fraud, accounting fraud, public service fraud, embezzlement, kleptocracy, influence peddling and conflicts of interest $(2016$: $8-9).$ The authors and contributors to this volume highlight other types of cor$-$ruption, including, for example, "tenderpreneurship" and "javelin$-$throwing", in addition to instances that fall within the Rose$-$Ackerman and Palifka framework, such as self$-$dealing, kickbacks and bribes. In other times and places and as the world becomes increasingly interconnected, corruption is $($not$-$so$/-$well$)$ well concealed behind bits and bytes, Os and $1$s$,$ traveling at light speed through the ether of the internet, its nefarious purposes carried out by shadowy lawyers with postal boxes for addresses in exotic locations such as the Cayman Islands, Jersey Islands, Panama and a multitude of tax havens; in such cases, you really don't know it when you see it$.$ Sometimes, it takes prosecution in a second jurisdiction for a country to catch on to the fact that graft occurred, as was the case with Smith & Ouzman in the UK in the early $2010$s