write a response with recent peer reviewed articles for this discussion post: My Doctoral Study examines how senior executives and crisismanagement leaders in mid-sized technology organizations integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into crisis response to reduce reputational and financial risk. The intended contribution is a practiceready typology of substantive CSRincrisis strategies (e.g., preauthorized relief triggers, equitable allocation criteria, multilingual transparency protocols) that leaders can embed in incident playbooks and governance reviews. This focus is grounded in my prospectus and emerging interview corpus, which frames CSR integration as a gap with tangible risk implications for technology organizations.

Recent evidence associates robust CSR with financial resilience in shocks, reputational buffering during societal crises, and strengthened organizational capabilitiessuggesting that codifying how executives operationalize CSR under stress can improve decision quality and stakeholder outcomes (Eng etal.,2024; Jin etal.,2024; Lu etal.,2024; Ma etal.,2024; Rolf,2023).

Scholarpractitioner process and rigor

As an independent scholar, I align a qualitative, pragmatic inquiry with reflexive thematic analysis to construct meaningbased themes from leaders' accounts, supported by a transparent audit trail and crosscase patterning. This approach makes the interpretive labor visible while maintaining analytic traction for managerial use (Braun & Clarke,2024). Interview craft emphasizes ethical rapport and neutral elicitation (brief "microcontracts," eventfocused probes, purposeful silence), which reduces interviewer effects and increases candorthereby elevating the practical validity of findings for leader decisionmaking (Demirci,2024). To protect trustworthiness, I monitor meaning saturation (conceptual, not just code accrual) and maintain a chain of evidence from data to claims. Together, these elements enact the scholarpractitioner model: rigorous methods yoked to questions that matter in practice, with explicit translation pathways from theme to tool.

Positive social change pathway

The study's outputsan evidencebased CSRincrisis playbook and an implementation checklistare designed to travel into organizational practice and community partnerships. Mapping themes to the READINESS keystone concept (preparedness, responsiveness, recovery) provides a multilevel logic for timely, credible, and equitable action in crises (Jin etal.,2024). Co-production and stakeholder engagement principles from implementation science further support the adoption and sustainment of practices, increasing the likelihood that those benefiting vulnerable employees and communities become routine rather than ad hoc (Boulton etal.,2025). By aligning analytic rigor with actionable guidance, the project advances Walden's socialchange mission: it links organizational continuity and risk reduction to fairer access to services, more protective employment practices, and transparent crisis communication.