Write an con $($against$)$ argument about this debate statement.

Do we need ethics to succeed as individuals or as a society? Do you think people will naturally behave in a way that allows society to sustain itself? What do you imagine society would be like if the idea of "ethics" $-$ as a concept and as a way of behaving $-$ did not exist? How closely do our values have to match those of other members of our society? Are there categories of behavior that require more agreement and shared values than others? How much divergence in our ethical values can we withstand and still be a society?