write research question and hypothesis for this case? Baskin$-$Robbins: Can It Bask in the Good 'Ole Days? Baskin$-$Robbins is the workd's largest chain of ice cream specialty shops. The company was named the top ice cream and frozen dessert franchise in the United States by Entrepreneur magazine's $35$th annual Franchise $5008$ ranking. As of $2018,$ Baskin$-$Robbins marketed innovative, premium ice cream. specialty frozen desserts and beverages to consumers at nearly $7,300$ retail shops in nearly $50$ countries. Headquartered in Canton, Massachusetts, Baskin$-$Robbins is part of the Dankin' Brands Group, Inc., family of companies. It was early December, and Baskin$-$Robbins Brand Officer Ken Kimmel had just returned from lunch. New entrants, such as Cold Stone Creamery founded in $1988,$ and others had popularized the in$-$store experience, with customers watching their ice cream creations being made before their eyes on cold stone slabs. In response, the Baskin$-$Robbins executive group along with Kimmel had recently moved to redesign stores, but it was not casy convincing the thousands of franchisees who ran the Baskin$-$Robbins stores to change. A store redesign could run up to $\backslash (\backslash$$ $50,000\backslash )$ and was funded mostly by the franchisecs. One aspect of the redesign resulted in lowering the ice cream cases to make it easier for children to look down into the ice cream bins. Another change being considered was changing the Baskin$-$Robbins logo to coincide with the redesign of store interiors. The logo appears on napkins, cone wrappers, spoons, cups, uniforms, and signs at each Baskin$-$Robbins store. The estimated cost for making such a change was $\backslash (\backslash$$ $5\backslash )$ million for Baskin$-$Robbins headquarters. Individual franchisees would have to invest about $\backslash (\backslash$$ $10,000\backslash )$ for the logo change to be made inside the stores. Later that afternoon, Kimmel's brand group was deep in discussion about whether to change the brand symbol of Baskin$-$Robbins at the same time stores would be redesigned. "The context has changed since the mid$-1980$s$,"$ visiting retailing consultant Zack Wheatly said. "Customers are more demanding about the hospitality experience. They earn more moncy and they can buy comparable ice creams to BaskinRobbins in grocery stores now. "Kimmel sensed it was time to mention recent strategy decisions by the Baskin$-$Robbins executive group. "While our competitors are pushing this mix$-$ in experience$-$a higherpriced theatre experience$-$Baskin$-$Robbins has decided to focus on delivering a great value for our consumers in an accessible kind of environment," Kimmel responded. "The executive group has decided that we are going to foeus on our new products as opposed to the theatre of the business. As part of this new emphasis, we have recently begun highlighting innovations such as our own frozen coffee beverage $-$ the Cappuccino Blast$-$and a fruit$-$based beverage$-$Bold Breezes, Carrying frozen custard is also on the horizon." Marsha Davis, Kimmel's rescarch director, took her turn in the conversation. $"$Is Baskin$-$Robbins such an established brand that the logo for Baskin$-$Robbins should not be overhauled?" Davis asked. "I know what you are suggesting," Wheatly replied. "Conventional wisdom in this industry would say that one shoukdn't tinker with an established brand." $"$We have discussed this among ourselves here at headquarters with the CEO and other senior executives, and we have also invested in hearing from consultants in retailing communications," Kimmel said. "They think the decision to change the logo should be taken only after extensive deliberation and direct research with customers." "Right," Wheatly said. "Analysts in the quick$-$service restaurant industry have reported in the trade journals that the new entrants have continued to grow faster than Baskin$-$Robbins especially in the key metric of same$-$store sales compared to the previous year. What did the qualitative research say about the proposed new logos$?"$ Davis paused, dug in her briefcase, and removed the glossy printed versions of the old logo and the leading candidate among the proposed new logos$.$ She put them both on the tablefacing the others. $"$We talked with four focus groups in Chicago, LA$,$ and New York, and they agreed that the Baskin$-$Robbins brand represented irresistible treats, smiles, and fun," Davis said. "They also liked this proposed logo that the senior executive group liked." $"$So where do we go from here?" Kimmel asked. "Because your management wants to make a change to the logo only if it is necessary, you should study your customers' attitude toward the new logo$,$ so that you can explain whether a logo change is warranted," Wheatly said. Everyone stopped talking to reflect on what was just said. After about $10$ seconds, Kimmel raised an open hand to the group. "Wait. This is beginning to remind me of the New Coke introduction," Kimmel said after some reflection. "Customers' subjective attachment to the old Coke was ignored, then. We need to ask about the old logo$,$ too. In addition, I know the senior executives want a clear margin of preference for the new logo$.$ If the new logo is not preferred $\backslash (2$: $1\backslash )$ in a head$-$to$-$head competition with the old one, we need to drop it$."$ Wheatly picked up the line of thought. $"$OK$,$ and now that you mention it$,$ we also need to pre$-$sent the drawings of the new redesigned stores and have the customers respond to the old and new logos after understanding what our new stores will be like," Wheatly said. $"$So restating our problem, I guess it sounds this way," Davis said. "Because management wants to make a change to the logo only if it is absolutely necessary, we should study our customers' attitudes toward the old logo and toward the new logo after showing them the drawings of the redesigned stores. Only then can we explain whether customers prefer the new logo $\backslash (2$: $1\backslash )$ over the old logo$."$ The words seem to hang in the air in the conference room at Baskin$-$Robbins headquarters. The statement of the marketing research problem was sounding much improved to Kimmel. However, he also had the following thoughts: $(1)$ Given that Baskin$-$Robbins had moved to redesign store interiors, should the brand logo be changed to signal something new is happening at Baskin$-$Robbins? $(2)$ If the logo were changed, would there be synergy between the logo change and the redesigned interiors? Synergistic results could be dramatic. A new look, a new menu, and a new strategy focused on delivering "irresistible treats, smiles and fun" in an accessible way and at a reasonable price could check the momentum rival brands had developed by focusing on a high$-$end, in$-$store experience. Considering these elements, the strategic importance of the Baskin$-$Robbins' research project became clear in Kimmel's mind. But had they missed anything in their process of developing the statement of the research problem? Were they focused on the right issue now? Should they continue to consider other logos for such a study? Should they just go ahead with the new logo because focus group participants had liked the new logo and the senior executives had, as well? What should they do$?$ Why?