Write this in four full paragraphs with 7 complete sentences each.

Which of these 5 strategies of constructive arguments do you feel are most important for a detective conducting an interview of a suspect or witness?

I believe that the most important strategy of constructive arguments for a detective conducting an interview of a suspect or witness is clarity. The detective must be clear and concise in their questioning, and they must make sure that the suspect or witness understands what they are asking. This will help to ensure that the detective gets accurate information from the suspect or witness.

How might the strategy or strategies you selected help a detective solve problems or mitigate risk during investigations or interrogations?

Clarity can help a detective solve problems or mitigate risk during investigations or interrogations in a number of ways. First, it can help to ensure that the detective gets accurate information from the suspect or witness. This information can then be used to solve the crime or to build a case against the suspect. Second, clarity can help to build rapport with the suspect or witness. This can make the suspect or witness more likely to cooperate with the detective and to provide accurate information. Third, clarity can help to reduce the risk of misunderstandings. This can help to ensure that the investigation or interrogation proceeds smoothly and that the detective gets the information they need.

**Reflect on what you have learned about extended arguments. Which critical thinking traits are most relevant when developing written or spoken extended arguments? Note: Consider reviewing the 10 personal traits of an effective thinker in Ch. 2, "Thinking Critically," in Thinking Critically.

The most relevant critical thinking traits when developing written or spoken extended arguments are:

Intellectual humility: An effective thinker is willing to admit when they are wrong and to change their mind in the face of new evidence.

Open-mindedness: An effective thinker is willing to consider all sides of an issue and to listen to different points of view.

Fairness: An effective thinker is fair and impartial in their reasoning.

Precision: An effective thinker is precise in their language and in their reasoning.

Relevance: An effective thinker only considers evidence that is relevant to the issue at hand.

Logic: An effective thinker uses sound logic in their reasoning.

Clarity: An effective thinker is clear and concise in their writing and speaking.

Organization: An effective thinker organizes their writing and speaking in a clear and logical way.

Style: An effective thinker uses language that is appropriate for the audience and the purpose.

How might developing written or spoken extended arguments help you mitigate risk or solve problems in the criminal justice career you would like to pursue?

Developing written or spoken extended arguments can help me to mitigate risk or solve problems in the criminal justice career I would like to pursue in a number of ways. First, it can help me to communicate effectively with other professionals in the criminal justice system. Second, it can help me to persuade others to my point of view. Third, it can help me to think critically about complex issues. Fourth, it can help me to develop a strong argument for my case. Fifth, it can help me to present my case in a clear and concise way.

I believe that developing written or spoken extended arguments is an important skill for anyone who wants to pursue a career in criminal justice. It is a skill that can help me to mitigate risk, solve problems, and be more effective in my work.