Question: Write three (3) factual scenarios that implicate character evidence. Each scenario should be independent of each other, i.e., they should not be based on the

Write three (3) factual scenarios that implicate character evidence. Each scenario should be independent of each other, i.e., they should not be based on the same nucleus of facts.

After each scenario, you should identify the doctrine(s) implicated by the scenario, and analyze why they would or wouldn't apply to the facts (i.e., IRAC it).

  1. Implicate a MIMIC-type non-propensity purpose, but not a character evidence exception.
  2. Implicate a character evidence exception, but not a MIMIC-type non-propensity purpose.
  3. Implicate both a MIMIC-type non-propensity purpose and a character evidence exception

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Scenario 1 Fact Pattern During the trial for assault and battery the defendants lawyer tries to introduce evidence that the victim has a history of starting fights in bars Doctrine Implicated Propensi... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!