Wrongful interference with a business relationship requires

an established business relationship between two parties

$,$ that the third party is

using predatory methods

$,$ with a purpose of

select answer

$.$ Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires

select answer

$,$ a third party who

select answer

$,$ and that same third party who

select answer

$.$

Assessment question

MedTron most appropriately should sue for wrongful interference with a

select answer

$.$

Assessment question

St$.$ Francis told Hubert that the contract

was not enforceable

$.$ St$.$ Francis

offered a job

to Hubert at a

higher

salary. Based on these facts, it

select answer

that St$.$ Francis intentionally induced Hubert to break his contract with MedTron.

Assessment question

Hubert

is not

liable for intentional interference with a contract because

only the third party who induced another to break a contract is liable

$.$

Assessment question

What If the Facts Were Different?

Assume that in the relevant jurisdiction, contracts with clauses restricting working for competitors for more than six months are deemed illegal and unenforceable.

Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires the existence of

an enforceable contract

$,$ third party

select answer

$,$ and

intentional inducement

$.$ Given these facts, the element of

intentional inducement

is missing from a wrongful interference with a contractual relationship claim. Given these facts, St$.$ Francis likely

select answer

liable for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.