XII In the Case ofA vs. E, B moved for the inhibition ofjudge X on the ground that ludge It is the first cousin of Atty. Y, counsel for A. Under Rule 13?I that relationship disqualifies the judge from handling the case. Despite the said relationship ludge K denied the motion for inhibition and proceeded to try the case which he conducted very fairly and with utmost competence. Judgment was rendered in favor ofA. If you are counsel for B what will be your remedy against the said judgment XIII A borrowed from E the latter's car on February 15. The agreement was for A to return the car on March 15. It is already March 25 but A would not return to E the car despite repeated demands from E. According to A, E still has a loan obligation to A. Allegedly, of the Php1I'r'I loan which 13 obtained from A sometime in 21:11:15 A only paid PhpED,. in El B said, however, that when the obligation fell due on December 2GB? he paid everything including the interests and other surcharges. If you are counsel for E what will you do to protect your client's interest especially so that the lack of mobility is taking a toll on E's business schedules? [5 points] XIV In the March 1 decision rendered in the case of A vs. B for unlawful detainer, the MTG ordered E to vacate the premises occupied by his manufacturing business plus payment of damages. Both A and 13 received the decision on March 5. Alleging that the case is one of accion publiciana involving a property with an assessed value of Phpl and filed in court 15 months after the last demand, 13 filed a notice of appeal to the RTC on March 111A filed a motion for execution on March 2i]