You are a newly promoted supervisor for Playing with God, a company that makes computer games for a Christian bookstore. One of the directors on the corporate board is Jon Bakker, a long lost nephew of TV evangelists Jim and Tammy Faye. Jon's son, Larry Bakker, is a member of your department. He writes the story lines that go into the different games. He has very little computer expertise, but he does have a creative writing degree and writes really great Bible-based game stories. One of his games has won an award in the Christian Video Game arena.

This morning you are served with a lawsuit from Nintendo. It alleges that your last game, Praying with Larry Podder, violates their exclusive right to market games under the Harry Potter label. You are incensed. Larry Podder was the invention of Larry Bakker and was actually a story he made up about himself, drawing on his own childhood experiences. At least, that is what he told you. You personally know that the aunt in the game looks just like Tammy Faye.

To make matters worse, you receive a phone call from your boss that Warner Brothers is preparing a lawsuit, unless you agree right now to pull Praying with Larry Podder from shelves and send them all the profits from the game, to date. Praying was your number one seller this year and could move your company into the first place rankings for Christian video games. Your boss, a company vice president, demands to know if the story line is even remotely like Harry Potter. You are horrified to admit you have no idea, having neither played the game nor having read Harry Potter.  

As if this wasn't bad enough, your boss states, "And why do you suppose Warner Brothers mentioned the Napster case in the call? We're not hosting file sharing in that game are we?" You are suddenly stricken as you remember that one of the really cool things about the game is that players can go online and share prayers, sheet music for hymns, and Christian music CDs in MP3 format. That was one of the best parts of the game. The vice president states, "The Warner Bros. exec said that his daughter just bought the game and called it the Christian Napster. Furthermore, I have a message from J. K. Rowling's attorney I have to return next. You better have an answer for this!" He hangs up.

Will being a Christian organization protect  from this lawsuit under the First Amendment? Is it analogous to parody?

What things/facts do  need to find out from Larry?

If  allowing file sharing on this game, does this open  up to liability for violation of the digital Millennium Copyright Act?

If it is true that the game is about Larry Bakker's life and not Harry Potter's, what will be needed to prove to defend against this lawsuit?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

While being a Christian organization may offer some protection under the First Amendment its unlikel... View the full answer