You are asked by stakeholders in the probation program what should be done about the low projected sample size. Because the program has only recently started, making a change now will not seriously influence the evaluability of the program, particularly as most facets of the program will remain unchanged. You know that a smaller sample size will limit your ability to detect significant differences between groups with respect to program outcomes, but increasing the sample comes with a potential complication, namely, that although the program is meant to be targeted towards very high risk probationers, to gain a large enough sample size they will need to recruit medium-risk and medium-high-risk probationers to participate in the program as well. You are apprehensive to include these individuals in the program, as it was not designed specifically for them, but you know that you need a larger sample size. Which alternative do you choose to move forward with the program evaluation? You expand eligibility criteria for the program to include medium-risk and medium-high-risk probationers to increase your expected sample size. Individuals will still be randomly selected from these groups, so your randomized evaluation can continue without any issues related to changing eligibility criteria