You will take on the role of a prosecutor who is wanting to introduce blood spatter evidence in a trial. The judge in the trial has ordered you to prepare written arguments in support of blood spatter analysis as a legitimate forensic science. Using the standards set in Frye vs. United States and Daubert vs. Dow, the two Supreme Court cases reviewed. Give at least 2 references

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Subject Written Arguments in Support of Admitting Blood Spatter Evidence Your Honor I am writing to present arguments in support of the admissibility of blood spatter evidence in the upcoming trial Th... View the full answer