You work as a software developer for a small startup company focused on developing productivity tools for businesses. In the course of your work, you come up with a unique algorithm that significantly enhances the speed and efficiency of data processing, making it a valuable asset for the company's flagship product.

Excited about your discovery, you share the details of the algorithm with your team during a brainstorming session. However, a few weeks later, you discover that the company's CEO has filed a patent application for the algorithm without giving you any credit or compensation. When you confront the CEO about this, they justify their actions by claiming that as an employee of the company, anything you create during work hours belongs to the company.

Now, you are faced with a moral dilemma:

Do you accept the CEO's explanation and relinquish your claim to the algorithm, potentially losing out on recognition and financial benefits?

Or do you challenge the CEO's decision, insisting on fair compensation and recognition for your contribution, even if it means risking your job and damaging your relationship with the company?

In your response, consider the ethical implications of each option and the broader implications for intellectual property rights within the context of employment. Explain the reasoning behind your decision and discuss any potential consequences for yourself, the company, and the industry as a whole.