Your client, Fatima is a permanent resident. She has been referred to an admissibility hearing on the basis that she made misrepresentations in her permanent residence application. She has two Canadian born children. Which of the following statements is false?

Question 8 options:

a)	If the ID finds Fatima to be inadmissible, it has to issue a removal order against her.

b)	Fatima can appeal the ID's decision to the IAD.

c)	The ID will consider if relevant humanitarian and compassionate factors outweigh Fatima's admissibility.

d)	Fatima can call witnesses to support her case.

Question 9 (1 point)

Julian is a permanent resident who, after receiving a removal order, is seeking to have it appealed at the IAD. Julian is concerned about the ID's decision and believes that he has very compelling humanitarian grounds in his case. Which of the following is true about the IAD's jurisdiction?

Question 9 options:

a)	The IAD can only depart from the determination made by the ID if they provide reasonable grounds for doing so.

b)	The IAD may only consider humanitarian and compassionate grounds if the ID did.

c)	The IAD is not bound by the previous determination and must consider the case anew.

d)	The IAD cannot consider evidence that was not before the ID.

Question 10 (1 point)

Your client, Elijah is attending a hearing before the IAD, appealing a removal order issued against him on the grounds of criminality. Elijah asks you what will happen if the IAD orders that his removal order is stayed. Which of the following statements is correct?

Question 10 options:

a)	If Elijah's removal order is stayed, it will be suspended for a period of time and the IAD will likely impose conditions on Elijah.

b)	If Elijah's removal order is stayed, his PR status will be restored.

c)	If Elijah's removal order is stayed, it will remain that way until the ID makes a decision on redetermination.

d)	If Elijah's removal order is stayed, he will no longer be inadmissible to Canada unless he commits another offence.

Question 11 (1 point)

Reyna, a PR was convicted of an indictable offence and sentenced to four months in prison. Would she be eligible for an appeal before the IAD?

Question 11 options:

a)	Yes, because Reyna's sentence was less than 6 months

b)	Not if Reyna is also sentenced to probation after the 6 months

c)	No, because Reyna would be inadmissible on serious criminality grounds

d)	Maybe, it depends on the seriousness of the offence committed by Reyna

Question 12 (1 point)

An appeal to the IAD is available for:

Question 12 options:

a)	Katie who was found inadmissible on medical grounds

b)	Serie who was found inadmissible on security grounds

c)	Jina who was found inadmissible for human rights violation

d)	Yuri who was found inadmissible for organized criminality

Question 13 (1 point)

Tabitha was convicted of possession of a Schedule II drug. She was sentenced to two years in prison and one year of probation. When can Tabitha apply for rehabilitation?

Question 13 options:

a)	After Tabitha has completed her prison time

b)	Five years after Tabitha has completed her prison time

c)	After Tabitha has completed her probation

d)	Five years after Tabitha has completed her probation

Question 14 (1 point)

Jeremy was convicted of drunk driving on July 1, 2021. He had his driver's license suspended for two years, with no imprisonment imposed. When can Jeremy apply for rehabilitation?

Question 14 options:

a)	Right away because Jamie does not need to serve prison time

b)	July 1, 2023

c)	July 1, 2026

d)	July 1, 2028