Your client has been detained for 6 months now. They have a detention review hearing at the IRB. Your client receives an unfavourable decision - they will remain in detention. One week later, you receive an anonymous letter advising that before the decision was released, it was reviewed and changed by the Chairperson. The decision had initially directed that your client should be released. The facts as presented constitute an impermissible incursion on adjudicative autonomy. Question 9 options: A) True B) False