Question: Your coworker does not have a strong background in hypothesis testing. You are tasked with reviewing the work of this co-worker. Your team is trying


Your coworker does not have a strong background in hypothesis testing. You are tasked with reviewing the work of this co-worker. Your team is trying to meet a tight deadline, and you would prefer to avoid redoing any analysis (if possible). You notice the following individual scenarios, all of which involve sample mean larger than the null hypothesis mean (X > Mo): 0 They should've actually_ run a onetailed hypothesis test (H 1 : X > No), but instead ran a twotailed hypothesis test (H1 : X 7E ,uo). Based on their (incorrect) test, they rejected the null hypothesis. Would you recommend re-running the analysis with the right settings? Why, or why not? 0 They should've actually run a twotailed hypothesis test (H 1 : X 75 ,uo), but instead ran a one-tailed hypothesis test (H 1 : X > #0). Based on their (incorrect) test, they failed to reject the null hypothesis. Would you recommend rerunning the analysis with the right settings? Why, or why not? 0 They should've actually_ run a twotailed hypothesis test (H1 : X 75 pg), but instead ran a one-tailed hypothesis test (H1 : X > MO). Based on their (incorrect) test, they rejected the null hypothesis. Would you recommend rerunning the analysis with the right settings? Why, or why not
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
