Your text and the class video presentation introduced you to the ideas of judicial activism versus judicial restraint. That is, some people believe that Supreme Court judges should be "activists" and make decisions in accordance with their political views and perspectives regarding what is good or bad public policy. Other people believe in judicial restraint, that is, the idea that judges should not make decisions as to whether a public policy is good or bad and only make judicial decisions based on the constitutionality of the matter at hand. In this discussion forum posting, please discuss which perspective you prefer and explain why.