Question: The article Approximate Methods for Estimating Hysteretic Energy Demand on Plan-Asymmetric Buildings (M. Rathhore, A. Chowdhury, and S. Ghosh, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011:99123) presents
The article “Approximate Methods for Estimating Hysteretic Energy Demand on Plan-Asymmetric Buildings” (M. Rathhore, A. Chowdhury, and S. Ghosh, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011:99–123) presents a method, based on a modal pushover analysis, of estimating the hysteretic energy demand placed on a structure by an earthquake. A sample of 18 measurements had a mean error of 457.8 kNm with a standard deviation of 317.7 kNm. An engineer claims that the method is unbiased, in other words, that the mean error is 0. Can you conclude that this claim is false?
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (168 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
X 4578 s 3177 n 18 There are 18 1 17 degrees of freedom The null and alternate hy... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
