Repeat the previous problem, but assume that the cost of the equipment is reduced from a government

Question:

Repeat the previous problem, but assume that the cost of the equipment is reduced from a government grant by \(20 \%\).

Problem 2.8

Repeat the previous problem, but assume that the cost of installation is to be repaid at \(7 \%\) interest over 15 years and that the electricity costs escalate at \(10 \%\) per year. Compare the NPV of the solar system in Problem 2.7 to that of an electric heating system over a 15 year period, then discuss whether or not the solar system is a good investment relative to the payback Time. Also prepare a spreadsheet showing the NPV for each year.

Problem 2.7

A rooftop solar hot water heater with collector areas of \(8 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) and storage of \(640 \mathrm{~L}\) is installed in Phoenix, Arizona, on a house that uses \(160 \mathrm{~L} /\) day of hot water at \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Of the total energy required, \(70 \%\) is supplied by solar energy (the solar fraction is \(70 \%\) ) and \(30 \%\) is supplemented with an electric heater. The solar system costs \(\$ 3000\) for installation, whereas an electric water heater and tank for the same supply costs \(\$ 800\) for installation. Assuming that the electricity cost is \(\$ 0.10 / \mathrm{kWh}\) and does not change over time, estimate the simple payback time for the solar hot water heater. The temperature of the water in the main from which it is to be heated is \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: