Question: Suppose a meta-analysis on the risks of drinking coffee included 100,000 participants of all ages across 80 studies. One of the conclusions was that a

Suppose a meta-analysis on the risks of drinking coffee included 100,000 participants of all ages across 80 studies. One of the conclusions was that a confidence interval for the relative risk of heart attack for women over 70 who drank coffee, compared with those who didn’t, was 0.90 to 1.30. The researchers concluded that coffee does not present a problem for women over 70 because a relative risk of 1.0 is included in the interval. Explain why their conclusion is not justified.

Step by Step Solution

3.39 Rating (168 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Their conclusion is equivalent to accepting the null hypothesis that the relative risk is a... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

591-M-S-S-M (550).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Statistics Questions!