Question: The 2012 amendments to the CVD statute, cited in this chapter, permits CVD duties on imports from NME countries retroactively to 2006. Wireking, an affected
The 2012 amendments to the CVD statute, cited in this chapter, permits CVD duties on imports from NME countries retroactively to 2006. Wireking, an affected importer, argued that this violated the Ex Post Facto provisions of the Constitution, prohibiting penalties from being imposed retroactively. Was the statute constitutional? Does the CVD statute creates a punitive or civil remedy? What was the intent of Congress: to impose punishment, or at least to impose highly punitive measures or did Congress intend a civil regulatory scheme? Are the CV duties paid to the government or to the person harmed? Who does the CVD statute really protect?
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.39 Rating (158 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
The statute was ruled constitutional and not a violation of ExPost Fa... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Document Format (1 attachment)
1374-L-B-L-L-E(5080).docx
120 KBs Word File
