Question: The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm.
Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/11 year-end financial statements for Company B:
.png)
You also determine that all of the assets constituting the plant and equipment of Company B were acquired at the same time, and that all of the $200,000 represents depreciable assets. Also, all of the depreciable assets have the same useful life and residual values are zero.
Required:
1. In order to compare performance with Company A, estimate what B's depreciation expense would have been for 2011 if the double-declining-balance depreciation method had been used by Company B since acquisition of the depreciable assets.
2. If Company B decided to switch depreciation methods in 2011 from the straight line to the double-declining-balance method, prepare the 2011 adjusting journal entry to record depreciation for theyear.
Income Statement Depreciation expense $10,000 Balance Sheet Assets Plant and equipment, at cost 2,00,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (40,000) Net $1,60,000
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (172 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Requirement 1 Determine useful life 200000 depreciable base 20year useful l... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
254-B-A-I-A (3388).docx
120 KBs Word File
