Question: The following regression was estimated for 23 quarters between 2004 and 2011 to test the hypothesis that tire sales (T) depend on new automobile sales

The following regression was estimated for 23 quarters between 2004 and 2011 to test the hypothesis that tire sales (T) depend on new automobile sales (A) and total miles driven (M). Standard errors are listed in parentheses.


The following regression was estimated for 23 quarters between 2


Here, N = 23, corrected R2 = .83, F = 408, standard error of the regression = 1.2, and Durbin-Watson statistic = 1.92.
a. Does the regression equation (and its estimated coefficients) make economic sense? Explain.
b. Based on the regression output, discuss the statistical validity of the equation.
c. Do the coefficients on “miles driven” and “new-auto sales” significantly differ from 1.0? Explain why we might use unity as a benchmark for these coefficients.

%AT .45 + 1.411%) + 1.12(%) (.32)(.19) (.41)

Step by Step Solution

3.49 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a Yes the equation makes economic sense Growth in tire sale... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

235-B-E-M-E (1204).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!