Question: The following regression was estimated for 23 quarters between 2004 and 2011 to test the hypothesis that tire sales (T) depend on new automobile sales
The following regression was estimated for 23 quarters between 2004 and 2011 to test the hypothesis that tire sales (T) depend on new automobile sales (A) and total miles driven (M). Standard errors are listed in parentheses.
Here, N = 23, corrected R2 = .83, F = 408, standard error of the regression = 1.2, and Durbin-Watson statistic = 1.92.
a. Does the regression equation (and its estimated coefficients) make economic sense? Explain.
b. Based on the regression output, discuss the statistical validity of the equation.
c. Do the coefficients on “miles driven†and “new-auto sales†significantly differ from 1.0? Explain why we might use unity as a benchmark for these coefficients.
%AT .45 + 1.411%) + 1.12(%) (.32)(.19) (.41)
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (159 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Yes the equation makes economic sense Growth in tire sale... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
235-B-E-M-E (1204).docx
120 KBs Word File
