The Gleasons owned a large piece of property. Part of it was subject to a public drainage easement. Taub went into the drainage area with a bulldozer and removed 16,000 cubic feet of dirt to use as fill on other land. The Gleasons sued him for trespass. He defended that he had a right to go on the public easement and, furthermore that his dirt removal improved the drainage in the easement. Who would you think correct? [Gleason v. Taub, 180 S.W.3d 711, Ct. App.,Tx. (2005)]