Question: The Isis Engineering Company operates a job-order costing system which includes the use of predetermined overhead absorption rates. The company has two service cost centres

The Isis Engineering Company operates a job-order costing system which includes the use of predetermined overhead absorption rates. The company has two service cost centres and two production cost centres. The production cost centre overheads are charged to jobs via direct labour hour rates which are currently £3.10 per hour in production cost centre A and £11.00 per hour in production cost centre B. The calculations involved in determining these rates have excluded any consideration of the services that are provided by each service cost centre to the other.
The bases used to charge general factory overhead and service cost centre expenses to the production cost centres are as follows:
(i) General factory overhead is apportioned on the basis of the floor area used by each of the production and service cost centres,
(ii) The expenses of service cost centre 1 are charged out on the basis of the number of personnel in each production cost centre.
(iii) The expenses of service cost centre 2 are charged out on the basis of the usage of its services by each production cost centre.
The company's overhead absorption rates are revised annually prior to the beginning of each year, using an analysis of the outcome of the current year and the draft plans and forecasts for
the forthcoming year. The revised rates for next year are to be based on the following data:

The Isis Engineering Company operates a job-order costing system which

(a) Ignoring the question of reciprocal charges between the service cost centres, you are required to calculate the revised overhead absorption rates for the two production cost centres. Use the company's established procedures.
(b) Comment on the extent of the differences between the current overhead absorption rates and those you have calculated in your answer to (a). Set out the likely reasons for these differences.
(c) Each service cost centre provides services to the other. Recalculate next year's overhead absorption rates, recognizing the existence of such reciprocal services and assuming that they can be measured on the same bases as those used to allocate costs to the production cost centres
(d) Assume that:
(i) General factory overhead is a fixed cost.
(ii) Service cost centre 1 is concerned with inspection and quality control, with its budgeted expenses (before any reallocations) being 10 per cent fixed and 90 per cent
variable.
(iii) Service cost centre 2 is the company's plant maintenance section, with its budgeted expenses (before any reallocations) being 90 per cent fixed and 10 per cent variable.
(iv) Production cost centre A is labour-intensive, with its budgeted overhead (before any reallocation) being 90 per cent fixed and 10 per cent variable.
(v) Production cost centre B is highly mechanized, with its budgeted overhead (before any reallocations) being 20 per cent fixed and 80 per cent variable. In the light of these assumptions, comment on the cost apportionment and absorption calculations made in parts (a) and (c) and suggest any improvements that you would consider appropriate.

centres reallocation) (E) 210000 93800 38600 182800 124800 5 15 0 63 1000 4000 25 000 120000 20000 calculation of this 100000 30 000

Step by Step Solution

3.37 Rating (169 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a a General factory overhead is apportioned to service cost centres before reallocation to production centres as indicated in note i of the question b Because reciprocal allocations are not made the c... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

769-B-C-A-D-M (340).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Cost Accounting Questions!