Question: The scatterplot and the model in Fig. 84 describe the association between the years and the winning times for the mens Olympic 100-meter run. Let

The scatterplot and the model in Fig. 84 describe the association between the years and the winning times for the men€™s Olympic 100-meter run. Let y be the winning time (in seconds) for the men€™s Olympic 100-meter run at x years since 0 a.d.
The scatterplot and the model in Fig. 84 describe the

a. The linear regression equation is = -0.01332x + 36.41. The Olympics were not held in 1940 and 1944. Predict what the 100-meter-run winning times would have been in those years. Round to the first decimal place.
b. Estimate the year and the winning time for the outlier, which is the data point for Tom Burke.
c. After the outlier was removed, a new scatterplot and new regression model were found (see Fig. 85). Is the outlier an influential point? Explain.
d. The new linear regression equation is = - 0.01175x + 33.30. Use this model to predict what the 100-meter-run winning times would have been in 1940 and 1944. Round to the first decimal place.
e. Compare your results in parts (a) and (d). Are they fairly close? Does this support your response to part (c)?

The scatterplot and the model in Fig. 84 describe the

Year versus Winning Time 12.5 12 115 F 10.5 10 t 9.5 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year Year versus Winning Time 11.5 10.5 F 10 9.5 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year

Step by Step Solution

3.41 Rating (160 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a The winning time in 1940 would have been 106 seconds The ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

708-M-S-D-A (6861).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Statistics Questions!