Question: Torsion during hip external rotation (ER) and extension may be responsible for certain kinds of injuries in golfers and other athletes. The article Hip Rotational
The following data was supplied by the article's authors.
.png)
a. Is it plausible that the differences came from a normally distributed population?
b. The article reported that mean (± SD) =-145.3(68.0) for ER velocity and = -227.8(96.6) for IR velocity. Based just on this information, could a test of hypotheses about the difference between true average IR velocity and true average ER velocity be carried out? Explain.
c. The article stated that "The lead hip peak IR velocity was significantly greater than the trail hip ER velocity (p50.003, t value53.65)." (The phrasing suggests that an upper-tailed test was used.) Is that in fact the case?
Golfer ER IR diff pere 1.7-1.28 115.9 -9.2 -0.97 1.7-161.6 109.9 0.34 7.2 -0.73 0.740.2-0.34 -274.9 173.9 0.97 24.4-275.0 250.6 .83 231-275.7 44.6-0.17 -186.8 -214.6 27.8-0.52 117.8 59.3 0.00 219.3 -326.7 074 0.17 272959.8 0.73 244.3 -429.184.8 1.28 184.4 -140.6 -43.8-1.83 199.2 -345.6 146.4 0.52 130.6 -98.9 125.1_- 4 179.7 -196.9 -130.5 -170.7 -101.0 8 10 -58.5 - 113.-212.9 12 13 14 15
Step by Step Solution
3.40 Rating (169 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Yes its quite plausible that the population distribution of differences is normal since the accomp... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
1172-M-S-S-D(4687).docx
120 KBs Word File
