Question: Two students are discussing the current chapter on dilutive securities and earnings per share. Here are some of the points raised in their discussion. 1.
1. Is there a difference between issuing convertible debt versus issuing debt with share warrants? Also, does it make a difference whether the share warrants are detachable or non-detachable?
2. Why is it that companies are not permitted to adjust compensation expense for share options when the options become worthless because the share price does not increase in value?
3. What is the rationale for using the treasury-share method in earnings per share computations?
4. Why do companies have to report compensation expense for employees share-purchase plans?
After the employee receives the shares, the price can go up or down, so what is the benefit that the employee is receiving?
Instructions
Prepare a response to each of the questions asked by the students.
Step by Step Solution
3.48 Rating (168 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Both convertible debt and debt issued with share warrants are accounted for as compound instruments IFRS requires that compound instruments be separated into their liability and equity components Debt issued with warrants is considered a compound instrument ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
255-B-A-S-E (609).docx
120 KBs Word File
