We saw in Exercise 57 that the number of fires was nearly constant. But has the damage

Question:

We saw in Exercise 57 that the number of fires was nearly constant. But has the damage they cause remained constant as well? Here's a regression that examines the trend in Acres per Fire, (in hundreds of thousands of acres) together with some supporting plots:
We saw in Exercise 57 that the number of fires

Dependent variable is Acres/fire
R-squared = 46.25% s = 20.08
Variable Coefficient
Intercept .....................................19.62
Years since 1985 ........................  2.22

We saw in Exercise 57 that the number of fires

a) Is the regression model appropriate for these data? Explain.
b) What interpretation (if any) can you give for the R2 in the regression table?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Stats Data and Models

ISBN: 978-0321986498

4th edition

Authors: Richard D. De Veaux, Paul D. Velleman, David E. Bock

Question Posted: