When a collective bargaining agreement with IMT expired, the workers went on strike. The company announced it would take crossovers and then hire replacement workers, which it did. After the strike was settled, the union claimed the company had to take back all strikers in place of the replacement workers. Is that position correct?
[Iowa Mold Tooling Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 828., 16 F.3d 311, 8th Cir. (1994)]