Wilspec and DunAn both produce and sell parts for air conditioning (AC) units. Wilspec entered into a three-year contract with DunAn, a Chinese corporation, for DunAn to make certain parts for AC units sold in North America. The DunAn parts were to be sold under the Wilspec name, and Wilspec would be the exclusive distributor in North America. Wilspec claims that while the contract was in force, DunAn intentionally interfered with Wilspec's contractual relations with its AC customers by soliciting the sale of products to Wilspec's customers in North America and by making disparaging remarks to Wilspec's customers about Wilspec's ability to perform. Does that appear to be the tort of intentional interference with a contract? [Wilspec Technologies v. DunAn Holding Group, 204 P.3d 69, Sup. Ct., Okla. (2009)]