Write a description about the contrast between 'social construct' (broader and implicit) vs. 'social contract' (narrower and either implicit or explicit). Explain the validity each type of human interaction (social, economic, political), and the value of each.
Answer these questions:
a. How do rate the levels at which we relate as humans? Rank them in their order of importance to you.
b. Why do we need social or political (even economic) contracts to get along in a free society? (One assumes without freedom in society, there is no choice on how to proceed, people are just under forced compliance). Is there room for a 'spiritual contract' of sorts (like a covenant), where theocracy is an option that people live by? Give examples of a theocracy both in the past and now. What are the benefits or dangers?