Question: You are responsible for developing training material for staff auditors on substantive sampling. After presenting it, staff auditors ask you several questions. Explain how you
a. Is it always better to sample more items than fewer items?
b. When should I stratify a sample?
c. How do I decide whether to perform substantive tests or to use analytical procedures? Analytical procedures are much easier than substantive testing.
d. How do I convince the client that the likely misstatements are valid misstate ments? For the known misstatements, I can show the client the documents to explain the misstatements. I can't do this for likely misstatements, so it is harder to convince the client that the misstatements are valid.
e. Why do I put the misstatements I found on the proposed audit adjustment schedule if the tolerable misstatement is higher than the projected misstatement for the account I am auditing? Why can't I just ignore these misstatements?
f. Can I do all the substantive testing at year-end? How long will it take?
Step by Step Solution
3.36 Rating (165 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Yes it is always better to sample more items than fewer items because a larger sample size reduces sampling risk However the auditor always faces a ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
386-B-A-A-A-N (3688).docx
120 KBs Word File
