Question: 1. Did the standards result in safer and more effective firefighting crews, or were they inadvertently keeping women out of a traditionally male job? 2.
1. Did the standards result in safer and more effective firefighting crews, or were they inadvertently keeping women out of a traditionally male job?
2. Was this a BFOQ? The ministry was challenged on the basis of sex discrimination. What did the Supreme Court rule, and what was its reasoning?
3. Female applicants had the chance to train and try the test at B.C. university campuses. Was this special preparation discriminatory?
4. Did the changes made fix the underlying problems? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
3.41 Rating (170 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 As evidenced by the subsequent court ruling the standards were inadvertentl... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
845-B-H-R-M-T-D (261).docx
120 KBs Word File
