1. How could the union have used either the principled negotiations or the collective bargaining by objectives techniques in this case to move the company closer to an agreement?
2. The company had previously negotiated contracts with a different union. Should the Court have considered that in deciding that the company now showed a lack of good faith?
3. Could the company's actions be defended as a bargaining technique?
4. In your opinion, why did the company adopt the bargaining strategy revealed in this case?