Question: 1. This case would seem to hold that agreeing to disagree on a mandatory bargaining subject does not violate the duty to bargain. Does it

1. This case would seem to hold that "agreeing to disagree" on a mandatory bargaining subject does not violate the duty to bargain. Does it violate the spirit of collective bargaining as a process?
2. Could this case have been avoided by better ground rules at the negotiating table? Give examples.
3. Do you think the court would have decided this case differently if the parties had never reached agreement?

Step by Step Solution

★★★★★

3.45 Rating (171 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer

Step: 1 Unlock

1 No as long as the parties are talking there is possibility of ... View full answer

Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock

Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

1434-L-B-L-A-A-E-L(1264).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!

1. What is the historical policy basis for the modern rule that minors contracts are voidable; and what is the basis for the exception that minors may be liable for necessaries? 2. In laypersons...

1. Does an employer violate the NLRA by making a unilateral change in a mandatory subject of bargaining? 2. Did the employers modification to the health care and life insurance benefits of future...

1. This case study describes several different strategies for attracting and retaining new employees. On the basis of the four drives described in four drive theory and the needs listed in Maslows...

Case Study 6-3. The Influenza Work Rule Mercy Hospital is an acute care facility employing nearly 5,000 employees, including 602 nurses; the nurses are represented by the Regional Nurses Association...

Reference: FOSSUM.. Labor Relations, 10th Edition. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions, 2008. VitalBook file. Page 429Chapter Thirteen Union-Management Cooperation Many labor relations practices are...

Chapter Ten Nonwage Issues in Bargaining Wage and nonwage issues are not completely separable. Both have economic consequences for the employer. For example, provisions relating to hours of work...

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila G.R. No. 123276 August 18, 1997 MARIO TIU and JONATHAN HAYUHAY, petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and REPUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM,...

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 123276 August 18, 1997 MARIO TIU and JONATHAN HAYUHAY, petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and REPUBLIC...

Reference FOSSUM. (2008). Labor Relations, 10th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com/books/1259220389/epubcfi/6/34 Page 294 Chapter Ten Nonwage...

Milwaukee Telecom (MT) reports the following items on its financial statements: $300 million of 18-year bonds with a coupon rate of 6.34% p.a. with interest paid semiannually. The company has a BB...

Suppose that you are considering an investment in an apartment building. Use th information provided below to answer the questions that follow: Type of Property: Apartment building Number of Units:...

we consider a 3 - period stock market model with evolution given in Fig. 1 below. Each period corresponds to one year. The interest rate is \ ( r = 0 \ % \ ) . Figure 1 : Stock evolution for Problem...

What is the relationship between the concept of comparative advantage and the law of increasing opportunity cost? LOP7

Eugene McCarthy began working for Nike in 1993 and was promoted to a footwear sales manager position in 1997. Following his promotion, McCarthy signed a covenant not to compete that stated, during...

1. Why do you think Target administered this test? What did it learn about each applicant as a result of the test? 2. Is there any relevance between the responses to the questions asked and the...

1. An approved drug use test must be conducted within reasonable parameters. In Capua, the court determined that a urine collection process may not be reasonable if done under close surveillance of a...

Arnold Inc. is considering the purchase of a new truck. It can choose between two brands. Brand A: buying the new truck for $120,000. This brand-A truck lasts for (7 + A) years (A: the remainder of...

Lush Gardens Co. bought a new truck for $52,000. It paid $5,200 of this amount as a down payment and financed the balance at 5.44% compounded semi-annually. If the company makes payments of $1,700 at...

roducing three different scenarios. Under a p essimistic scenario the property would produce a B IRRp0f8%; a most-likely scenario produces a BTIRRp of 12%. The investor assigns the pessimistic...