Question: 1. If the children had suffered no harm as a result of the attorneys malpractice, would the outcome of this case have been different? Why
2. Why did the court affirm the dismissal of Guido’s individual claim but not the claims that she had brought on behalf of the children?
3. If one of the children had not been a minor at the time of the father’s death, the court would have dismissed his or her claims against Stern, even though he or she was an intended beneficiary. Is it fair for the law to treat minors differently than other children with regards to a statute of limitations? Why or why not?
4. How might Stern, or anyone in a similar position, have avoided the negative result in this case?
Step by Step Solution
3.32 Rating (167 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Yes In fact very likely there would not be a case because Guido sought to recover damages only for the children realizing that she had no chance of recovering because the Statute of Limitations had ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
311-L-B-L-B-R (268).docx
120 KBs Word File
