Question: 1. If the children had suffered no harm as a result of the attorneys malpractice, would the outcome of this case have been different? Why

1. If the children had suffered no harm as a result of the attorney’s malpractice, would the outcome of this case have been different? Why or why not?
2. Why did the court affirm the dismissal of Guido’s individual claim but not the claims that she had brought on behalf of the children?
3. If one of the children had not been a minor at the time of the father’s death, the court would have dismissed his or her claims against Stern, even though he or she was an intended beneficiary. Is it fair for the law to treat minors differently than other children with regards to a statute of limitations? Why or why not?
4. How might Stern, or anyone in a similar position, have avoided the negative result in this case?

Step by Step Solution

3.32 Rating (167 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 Yes In fact very likely there would not be a case because Guido sought to recover damages only for the children realizing that she had no chance of recovering because the Statute of Limitations had ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

311-L-B-L-B-R (268).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!