Question: 1. If the children had suffered no harm as a result of the attorneys malpractice, would the outcome of this case have been different? Why

1. If the children had suffered no harm as a result of the attorney’s malpractice, would the outcome of this case have been different? Why or why not?

2. Why did the court affirm the dismissal of Guido’s individual claim but not the claims that she had brought on behalf of the children?


[Reyna] Guido is the mother of two minor children. [Domingo] Martinez, the children’s father, died after he was run over by a car on July 8, 2001. Martinez was the victim of a hit-and-run accident. Guido, as personal representative of Martinez’s estate, retained [Sandra] Stern to file a wrongful death lawsuit. On July 8, 2003, Stern filed a wrongful death complaint in the district court. But Stern admits that she never perfected service of the complaint, and because the complaint was not served within six months of filing, the case was dismissed by operation of law.


Step by Step Solution

3.39 Rating (183 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 Yes In fact very likely there would not be a case because Guido sought to recover damages only for the children realizing that she had no chance of ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

212-L-B-L-B-R (219).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!