Question: 1. Was the verdict fair? 2. Will this verdict cause other companies to review for and remedy any systematic discrimination uncovered? 3. How should systemic

1. Was the verdict fair?
2. Will this verdict cause other companies to review for and remedy any systematic discrimination uncovered?
3. How should systemic discrimination be prevented?
4. Were the lawyer’s fees fair?
5. Could this case have been successfully prosecuted if it were not a class action?

On May 17, 2010, a federal jury in New York decided that Novartis, a Swiss-headquartered drug company, was guilty of discriminating against women and should pay the 12 women plaintiffs who testified in the trial $3.37 million in compensatory damages.1 Since there were 5,600 women in the class the plaintiffs were arguing on behalf of in the class action lawsuit, the total compensatory damages could have reached $1 billion if two-thirds of the plaintiffs had gone to New York and to state their case.

Step by Step Solution

3.36 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 It is very difficult to determine what constitutes a fair verdict in a case were pervasive actions have a general impact over a large number of people however the verdict should send a clear message ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

346-B-O-B-B-E (656).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Organizational Behavior Questions!