1 What is the difference between the rule of reason and per se illegality in antitrust cases Are these standards created by Congress or the courts 2 What is the difference between interbrand and intrabrand competition Which type of competition is antitrust law primarily designed to promote 3 Vertical price restraints may lead to higher prices for the manufacturers goods, but the Court does not find this particularly troubling Why might higher prices not necessarily indicate anticompetitive conduct 4 What types of activities might send a signal that resale price maintenance is being used for anticompetitive purposes OPINION BY Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court In Dr Miles Medical Co v John D Park Sons Co , 220 U S 373 (1911), the Court established the rule that it is per se illegal under 1 of the Sherman Act for a manufacturer to agree with its distributor to set the minimum price the distributor can charge for the manufacturers goods The Court has abandoned the rule of per se illegality for other vertical restraints a manufacturer imposes on its distributors Respected economic analysts, furthermore, conclude that vertical price restraints can have pro competitive effects We now hold that Dr Miles should be overruled and that vertical price restraints are to be judged by the rule of reason

Question

1  What is the difference between the rule of reason and per se illegality in antitrust cases  Are these standards created by Congress or the courts  2  What is the difference between interbrand and intrabrand competition  Which type of competition is antitrust law primarily designed to promote  3  Vertical price restraints may lead to higher prices for the manufacturers goods, but the Court does not find this particularly troubling  Why might higher prices not necessarily indicate anticompetitive conduct  4  What types of activities might send a signal that resale price maintenance is being used for anticompetitive purposes  OPINION BY  Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court  In Dr  Miles Medical Co  v  John D  Park   Sons Co , 220 U S  373 (1911), the Court established the rule that it is per se illegal under  1 of the Sherman Act for a manufacturer to agree with its distributor to set the minimum price the distributor can charge for the manufacturers goods        The Court has abandoned the rule of per se illegality for other vertical restraints a manufacturer imposes on its distributors  Respected economic analysts, furthermore, conclude that vertical price restraints can have pro competitive effects  We now hold that Dr  Miles should be overruled and that vertical price restraints are to be judged by the rule of reason

SolutionInn · Accepted Answer

1 The rule of reason requires a factspecific casebycase determination of whether a particular practi...

Question: 1. What is the difference between the rule of reason and per se illegality in antitrust cases? Are these standards created by Congress or the

Step by Step Solution

Document Format (1 attachment)

219-L-B-L-P-L (45).docx

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!