1. Which ethical theories could be applied here?
2. The administrator of the BP compensation fund argues that everyone should be compensated according to his or her loss in the disaster. Those with an opportunity to make money (such as Gus) were at an advantage and should not, therefore, receive the same amount. Is that an ethical argument? Why or why not?
3. If you were a business owner who did not have the chance to work for BP and you heard that people like Gus were getting the same compensation as you, how would you react?
4. How would you resolve the situation?