Question: 1. Why did the court conclude that Krasner did not have a valid claim for hostile environment discrimination? 2. Suppose that a female employee had
1. Why did the court conclude that Krasner did not have a valid claim for “hostile environment” discrimination?
2. Suppose that a female employee had experienced the same type of treatment that Krasner had. Would the female employee succeed in a Title VII claim of gender-based discrimination? Why or why not?
Plaintiff David Krasner brings this action against his former employer, HSH Nord bank AG (“HSH”), and his supervisor while employed there, Roland Kiser, alleging [among other things] sexual discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendant HSH is an international commercial bank, headquartered in Germany, and has offices worldwide, including a branch in New York City.
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (158 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 The court stressed that although Krasner may have been subjected to a hostile wor... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
212-L-B-L-L-E (1641).docx
120 KBs Word File
