Question: 1. Why did the court conclude that Krasner did not have a valid claim for hostile environment discrimination? 2. Suppose that a female employee had

1. Why did the court conclude that Krasner did not have a valid claim for “hostile environment” discrimination?

2. Suppose that a female employee had experienced the same type of treatment that Krasner had. Would the female employee succeed in a Title VII claim of gender-based discrimination? Why or why not?


Plaintiff David Krasner brings this action against his former employer, HSH Nord bank AG (“HSH”), and his supervisor while employed there, Roland Kiser, alleging [among other things] sexual discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendant HSH is an international commercial bank, headquartered in Germany, and has offices worldwide, including a branch in New York City.

Step by Step Solution

3.45 Rating (158 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 The court stressed that although Krasner may have been subjected to a hostile wor... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

212-L-B-L-L-E (1641).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!