Question: 1. Why didnt the Dow Corning ethics audit program reveal any concerns about the silicone-gel breast implant line? 2. What are the critical factors necessary
2. What are the critical factors necessary to make such an ethics audit program work effectively?
3. Was the announcement on March 20 well-advised and ethical?
4. Are there any other ethical dilemmas raised by the case?
On January 6, 1992, the “growing controversy over the safety factor led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to call for a moratorium on breast implants.”1As January wore on, the crisis deepened until, on January 30, the Tor- onto Globe & Mail carried a New York Times Service report entitled “Dow Corning Fumbles in Damage Control.” Among other critical points, that article stated:
Step by Step Solution
3.32 Rating (167 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Usually the class suggests several reasons for the failure of the ethics audit program to surface the breast implant issue at an early stage so that it could be acted upon and resolved as early as p... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
346-B-O-B-B-E (598).docx
120 KBs Word File
