A judge denied a 94-year-old woman's attempt to force the Massachusetts Lottery Commission to pay her entire

Question:

A judge denied a 94-year-old woman's attempt to force the Massachusetts Lottery Commission to pay her entire $5.6 million winnings up front on the grounds that she otherwise won't live long enough to collect it all. The ruling means that the commission can pay Louise Outing, a retired waitress, in installments over 20 years. After an initial gross payment of $283,770, Outing would be paid 19 annual gross checks of $280,000. That's about $197,000 after taxes. Lottery Executive Director Joseph Sullivan said all players are held to the same rules, which are printed on the back of Megabucks tickets. Lottery winners are allowed to "assign" their winnings to a state-approved financial company that makes the full payment-but only in return for a percentage of the total winnings. Outing, who won a Megabucks drawing in September, has seven grandchildren, nine great-grandchildren, and six great-great-grandchildren. "I'd like to get it and do what I want with it," she said. "I'm not going to live 20 years. I'll be 95 in March."
(a) Suppose that she were able to find an investor who was willing to buy her lottery ticket for $2 million. Recall that after an initial gross payment of $283,770, Outing would be paid 19 annual gross checks of $280,000. If she could invest her money at 8% interest, what would be the fair amount to trade her 19 future lottery receipts? (Note that she already cashed in $283,770 after winning the lottery, so she is giving up 19 future lottery checks in the amount of $280,000.)
(b) What is the rate of return for this investor who is willing to buy Ms. Outing's lottery ticket?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: