Question: A land developer started a retirement village in an area known for its large cattle feedlots. Later, after much of the village was built and
Later, after much of the village was built and sold, the developer brought a nuisance action against the largest feedlot owner in the area.
The developer claimed that the feedlot was polluting the air with terrible odors, causing discomfort to the residents of the village and reducing the value of the remaining lots. Assume the court found the feedlot to be a nuisance. What should be the remedy? Could the feedlot be a nuisance in one location and acceptable in another? [Spur Industries v. Del Webb Development, 494 P.2d 700, Sup. Ct., Ariz.(1972)]
Step by Step Solution
3.32 Rating (173 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Webb developed Sun City Arizona a retirement village His sales were hurt by odors from Spurs nearby ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
154-L-B-L-L-E (1155).docx
120 KBs Word File
