Question: A recent study found that racially mixed juries deliberated longer, raised more facts, and conducted broader and more wide ranging deliberations than either all white
A recent study found that racially mixed juries “deliberated longer, raised more facts, and conducted broader and more wide ranging deliberations” than either all white or all black juries. Why do you think this was so? Do you think that “mixed” juries are more likely to avoid groupthink than racially homogeneous juries? Explain your reasoning.
Step by Step Solution
3.43 Rating (178 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
A racially mixed jury is a heterogeneous group Research shows that a heterogeneous grou... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
23-B-O-B-IP (14).docx
120 KBs Word File
