a) What is the basis for i.LAN's and Next Point's dispute?
b) What law governs the software licenses in question?
c) Then what law does the court use to resolve the dispute?
d) Why?
e) Do you mean the court ignores the common law - which arguably should apply in the absence of any software license specific legislation to the contrary-and applies Article 2 of the UCC, which the court acknowledges does not apply to software licenses?