a) What sections of Article 2 govern this case?
b) There are several questions in this case. Which issue is the most important?
c) Who is actually litigating this case?
d) Ignore the law for a moment and make a common sense argument that the dealer's insurer ought to win.
e) Now make a common sense argument that the dealer's insurer ought to lose.
f) According to the court, who does have an insurable interest in the car?
g) Why does the court reach that conclusion?
h) However, the contract also states that the buyer agrees to insure the car. Doesn't that mean that the Kennedys were obligated to do that, and that their insurer should be liable?