Question: Arthur Andersen had served as the auditor for Enron, with David Duncan as the partner handling the account. On October 16, 2001, Enron refused to

Arthur Andersen had served as the auditor for Enron, with David Duncan as the partner handling the account. On October 16, 2001, Enron refused to change its earnings release in response to Andersen’s concerns. Andersen then had to end its audit engagement, and its legal counsel sent to employees a copy of the company’s document destruction policy. Enron announced publicly that it was facing an SEC inquiry. During this time, employees at Andersen began shredding and destroying both paper and electronic documents. The SEC began a formal investigation on October 30, 2001. On November 8, 2001, Andersen received subpoenas for its records on Enron. Duncan’s secretary sent the following e- mail: “Per Dave— No more shredding.… We have been officially served for our documents.” Enron filed for bankruptcy less than a month later. Duncan was fired and later pleaded guilty to witness tampering (a plea he was later permitted to withdraw). Applying the Park case and the obstruction statute, who is criminally liable for shredding the documents? The employees who did it? the managers who ordered it to begin? The company itself? Were the employees who were shredding technically not in violation of the law while documents were being destroyed because there was no formal notice until November 8?

Step by Step Solution

3.40 Rating (166 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Key discussion points Auditors knew there were issues with Waste Managements books an... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

612-L-B-L-L-E (3434).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!